On 17.07.06 22:00:41, Arve Knudsen wrote: > Ok, I found the original thread. There is no explanation as to why no > extra reference is kept however.
I don't know too much about python refcounting, but I think one problem could be what to do if the model index disappears. Also decrease the reference count? This could lead to a problem if "something" else still needs the object... Phil needs to answer this. > There might be a good reason for this > behaviour, but it does represent a rather nasty pitfall. Well, that's probably a reason why it was introduced so late, you had to use internalId before. Andreas -- You had some happiness once, but your parents moved away, and you had to leave it behind. _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [email protected] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
