On Friday 08 September 2006 9:34 pm, Jim Bublitz wrote: > I expect Phil's stuff is quite good, but I don't know how releasable it is > or whether Phil wants to keep it proprietary (which I would understand > completely). The other problem is likely that Qt uses "less" of C++ than > KDE does, so Phil may not have addressed a number of issues. For example, > there actually is somewhere in KDE a declaration like "unsigned long > integer", whereas in Qt it would just be "ulong" or some macro everywhere, > or the use of "explicit" with ctors.
You should beat me up about limitations like these. BTW, "explicit" is supported. Phil _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [email protected] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
