On Sunday 10 June 2007 5:17 pm, Kovid Goyal wrote: > Hmm then it must be something else in my environment. I'm now with fewer > non-default flags, unfortunately I only have an old and slow G3 to test on, > it takes 12 hrs to compile Qt. > > Do you have any suggestions on what sort of thing could be causing this? It > would be immensely helpful if I didn't have to recompile everything more > than once. > > Thanks, > > Kovid. > > On Sunday 10 June 2007 08:18:41 Phil Thompson wrote: > > On Sunday 10 June 2007 3:55 pm, Kovid Goyal wrote: > > > So I cannot create a Universal binary for distribution of my PyQt based > > > app? That's something of a blow. Is there an estimate on when you > > > expect support to be completed? Is there anything I can do to help? > > > > > > It did compile fine, but no non-trivial code runs on it. That test case > > > was just one error I see. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Kovid. > > > > > > > sip's -n option isn't fully implemented yet - I'm surprised the code > > > > compiles. > > > > > > > > The script runs fine for me with normal builds. > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > Sorry, my mistake. I was referring to sip's -n flag, you were referring > > to sip's configure.py's -n flag. > > > > Phil > > _______________________________________________ > > PyQt mailing list [email protected] > > http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt > > > > !DSPAM:2,466c16ed289661902568488!
Exactly when is the message displayed? Is it before the first line of your script is executed? I'd suspect the problem is your static Qt build - that's probably the biggest difference to mine. Phil _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
