On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Phil Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Saturday 26 April 2008, Arve Knudsen wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Phil Thompson > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Friday 25 April 2008, Arve Knudsen wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Phil Thompson > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Tonight's PyQt snapshot will have some support for storing a Python > > > > > object in a QVariant so the following code works... > > > > > > > > > > from PyQt4.QtCore import QVariant > > > > > > > > > > class Klass(object): pass > > > > > > > > > > k = Klass() > > > > > v = QVariant(k) > > > > > v1 = QVariant(v) > > > > > assert v1.toPyObject() is k > > > > > > > > > > Let me know if more is needed. > > > > > > > > I'm missing a way to specify the QVariant::Type for such an object. > > > > > > Why would you want to give each Python type a different metatype? > > > > Because of my original case, to be able to work with > > QItemEditorFactory, which parameterizes on QVariant::Type (see > > QItemEditorFactory::registerEditor). > > Tonight's snapshot... > > The QVariant() ctor will now register new Python types automatically. I've > also wrapped QMetaType.type() and overloaded it so that you can pass a Python > type. I think this is enough for what you need.
Sounds like it should be enough. Thanks! Arve _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
