On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:05:16 -0700, "Erick Tryzelaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Phil Thompson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The "virtual"s aren't valid, but the super-classes should be. Fixed in >> tonight's snapshot. > > Thanks again for the change, Phil. I think you might be mistaken on > this point though. Looking at the c++ standard that I found: > > http://www.kuzbass.ru/docs/isocpp/ > > In section 9-4, it says that structs are just classes that default to > public. Furthermore, in section 10.3-2, they give an example of > structs with virtual methods. It's fine with me if you don't to add > support to sip for this. I can work around it by just using "class" in > my sip file and "struct"s in my headers, it's just a tiny bit more > verbose.
It's the virtual constructors that are invalid, not virtual methods. Phil _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
