Giovanni Bajo <rasky <at> develer.com> writes: > By hand :) But I think the data structure per-se is correct. I have > reviewed it many times, and I have even verified that, when that > convertor is called, the correct result is returned but it is then > discarded because of that specific subtype check (whose purpose is still > unknown to me).
The only difference I can see from the PyQt4 generated class_graph is that the index 15 is used more then once. I have replaced the last 2 occurences with -1 (no siblings), this should only avoid some more work, and the previous bug is there with both the class_graph versions. _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
