On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:09:56 +0000, "Paul A. Giannaros" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > When there was a discussion regarding PyQt wishes for Python 3.0 I > proposed changing the mechanism by which you refer to symbols[1] . > Thus something like "QtGui.QApplication" could be refered to as > "Qt.Application". > As Qt does not use namespaces itself, there would be no conflicts of > names. The idea is that you'd then import any module and its symbols > would then be added to the Qt namespace when you've done so. This > system would therefore save on redundant typing while sidestepping > namespace pollution. > > Any thoughts on this?
Nothing printable ;) You can already do Qt.QApplication is you really want to, so you are saving yourself one character. Qt does use namespaces. KDE uses lots of namespaces. A class in PyQt should have the same name as the class in Qt if at all possible. Phil _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
