Hi, I think the Sphinx style should be prefered. As far as I know (please confirm) Sphinx has the capability to generate Qt Help files (*.qch) as well. If that is true, one could satisfy both parties.
Regards, Detlev On Samstag, 7. März 2009, Phil Thompson wrote: > On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 18:06:12 +0100, Detlev Offenbach > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > please include the PyQt4 documentation as a compressed Qt Help files > > (*.qch) > > as well. eric4 will support Qt Help collections starting with the first > > 4.4 > > > snapshot. > > An opportune moment to ask for opinions... > > When I (eventually) get round to improving the PyQt docs (particularly > making the API reference more Pythonic) it will be designed to support (in > theory) multiple output styles. In the Roadmap I specifically mention the > traditional Qt style and Sphinx (ie. that used for the Python v2.6 > documentation). > > Which of these two styles do people prefer? > > Phil > _______________________________________________ > PyQt mailing list [email protected] > http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt -- Detlev Offenbach [email protected] _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
