On 12.03.09 22:58:56, Damien Elmes wrote: > It's all very well to say it's a client issue, but if the majority of > people are using clients that don't make it easy, then there's an > argument for being more pragmatic.
Yeah, its always easier to ignore problems, then to fix them or change one's habits and get used to another client :) Besides I think reply-all makes it easy enough not to sacrifice the use of the reply-to field. And AFAIK reply-all is something thats supported by _all_ mail clients. Anyway, just wanted to shed some light on the issue, personally I don't care too much either way (except that I think its wrong to workaround this particular issue on each mailinglist just so some developers don't have to integrate a certain patch). My client works with and without reply-to set to the list. Andreas -- You will pioneer the first Martian colony. _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
