On Thursday 09 April 2009 13:41:28 jelle feringa wrote: > I've searched this mailing list and although the QT lgpl news was discussed > at length, but I couldnt distill from this list whether pyqt will follow > qt's licensing model. Has this been decided yet?
I think one of the main reasons Qt was released under LGPL was that Nokia isn't as dependent on the paid licenses as trolltech was. Which leads to: As soon as riverbankcomputing gets bought by a big company or becomes a big company itself, they will have an easier decision about LGPL. But when you are making money with your (presumable) closed-source pyqt app, why should the makers of pyqt go for free??? Have fun, Arnold
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
