Thanks for the quick turn around. -Aron
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Phil Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:38:40 -0500, Aron Bierbaum <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I have recently downloaded and testing with the latest PyQt 4.5 >> snapshot, 20090426, and I am having a few problems. If I run the >> attached test program with PyQt 4.4.4 and Qt 4.5.0 I get the correct >> output: >> >> Square 1 bounds: PyQt4.QtCore.QRectF(10.000000720000001, >> 942.36217671999998, 100.00000056, 100.00000055999999) >> Square 2 bounds: PyQt4.QtCore.QRectF(119.99999839, 832.36216838999997, >> 99.999998219999981, 99.999998220000066) >> Square 3 bounds: PyQt4.QtCore.QRectF(230.00000691, 942.36218690999999, >> 100.00000317999999, 100.00000318000002) >> >> But if I run with Qt 4.5.0 and the latest PyQt 4.5 snapshot I get >> empty QRects for all bounds: >> >> Square 1 bounds: PyQt4.QtCore.QRectF(0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0) >> Square 2 bounds: PyQt4.QtCore.QRectF(0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0) >> Square 3 bounds: PyQt4.QtCore.QRectF(0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0) >> >> I have looked at the changes between the two versions, and I can't see >> anything that would cause this to happen. Am I the only one that is >> seeing this? Does anyone have any ideas on what could be going wrong? > > It's caused by me reordering some methods that means the filename you are > passing is being interpreted as the SVG data. > > Tonight's snapshot will revert those changes - and (hopefully) properly > fixes the original problem. > > Thanks, > Phil > _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
