On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Attila Csipa <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I understand correctly what you want to do, it has little to do with PyQt, > it would be more of a PyQML custom binding... Which is interesting, but sounds Right - it would be a "lighter" solution, if it would indeed be as thin as I'm thinking should be possible. Clearly it wouldn't have all the power PyQt solution would have. > like quite a niche to me - it will be hard to avoid Qt parts, and at that > point it's much easier to go via the 'main' PyQt path. But, I'm no QML expert Yeah, the PyQt path will be easier and more flexible. The "custom qml wrapping" would be more akin to "occams razor" solution to the problem, with as little of the middleman present as possible. -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
