On Fri May 7 17:47:56 BST 2010, William Kyngesburye wrote: > Note that while the Qt installers work for multiple system versions (10.4 - > 10.6), PyQt must be built for a specific python version. There are also 2 > versions of Qt for OS X - Carbon and Cocoa. So that will make 5 builds to > maintain: > > Qt Carbon for OS X 10.4 (Python 2.3) (is 2.3 even possible? or desirable?) > Qt Carbon for OS X 10.5 (Python 2.5) > Qt Carbon for OS X 10.6 (Python 2.6)
Is there still a big demand for a Carbon-based Qt? (What happened to Python 2.4, by the way?) > Qt Cocoa for OS X 10.5 (Python 2.5) > Qt Cocoa for OS X 10.6 (Python 2.6) > > This would be for the system Python. Though the same-python-version build > of Pyqt should be usable between the system and python.org Pythons. You > could limit yourself to system versions Apple supports and skip the first > one. Or drop Carbon support and just have two... > Another issue is that building *for* the system Python 2.5 on OS X 10.5 is > a bit difficult (impossible?) to do *on* OS X 10.6 (the SDKs don't work for > this). And switching Qt Cocoa/Carbon could be messy. You'd need 4 Macs > (or 2 if you can easily switch Qt's) to build the 4 combinations (not > counting the oddball 10.4+2.3). Does Apple ship Python 3 yet? Are developers starting to use it? David _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
