yes, I think that there are some features that are the same in both (entought toolkit and dip) but, in my opinion, enthought toolkit is too performance eater.
On 7/17/10, Antonio Valentino <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Il giorno Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:02:57 +0100 > Phil Thompson <[email protected]> ha scritto: > >> dip v0.1 has been released. This is the first release of dip, an >> application development framework for PyQt and (for the moment at >> least) Python v3. >> >> The user documentation, including tutorials and a full API reference >> is available at >> http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/static/Docs/dip/index.html >> >> dip is suitable for developing simple utilities and large scale, >> complex applications. It includes the following features... > > [...] > > first of all congratulations for the great job. > > I have still not finished to read the docs but it seems to me that many > of the features provided by dip are also present in the enthought > framework (Traits, Envisage, etc.). > > I would like to ask you why you decided to develop a new framework and > which are advantages/drawbacks of using dip instead of enthought. > > > Best regards > > -- > Antonio Valentino > _______________________________________________ > PyQt mailing list [email protected] > http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt > -- Lic. José M. Rodriguez Bacallao Centro de Biofisica Medica ----------------------------------------------------------------- Todos somos muy ignorantes, lo que ocurre es que no todos ignoramos lo mismo. Recuerda: El arca de Noe fue construida por aficionados, el titanic por profesionales ----------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
