On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:47:55PM +0000, Phil Thompson wrote:
> That would probably work, but it relies on there being a public copy ctor
> for A. It's a strange API that has a public copy ctor but no other public
> ctor.
Yes, the second one needs a public copy ctor, but not the first
one (that's why I would prefer the one with the auto_ptr and I
think it's kosher but am, as i wrote not 1000% sure yet). And,
yes, my API is that strange - A is an accessor class that can
be obtained only from a parent class that also manages the un-
derlying object that the accessor represents, but getting a copy
of the accessor is not a problem;-)
Thanks and best regards, Jens
--
\ Jens Thoms Toerring ________ [email protected]
\_______________________________ http://toerring.de
_______________________________________________
PyQt mailing list [email protected]
http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
