On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:38:37 +0100, "Hans-Peter Jansen" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday 25 February 2011, 12:20:05 Phil Thompson wrote: >> On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:51:17 +0000, Jonathan Riddell >> <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> > On 29 January 2011 17:57, Jonathan Riddell <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> -x PyQt_qreal_double doesn't seem to be working with current sip >> >> and pyqt. Anyone know why? >> >> >> >> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264506 >> > >> > This was due to us missing out this patch >> >> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/natty/python-qt4/ >>natty/view/head:/debian/patches/qreal_float_support.patch >> >> > which improves support for architectures where qreal != double. >> > >> > Jonathan >> >> The first patch only makes sense if a qreal has the same size as a >> double, but has a different binary format. Is this the case? >> >> The second patch might be better as a part of PyKDE, as it is not >> needed by PyQt. > > but is a real PITA for packagers, if a PyQt patch has to be maintained > separately in order to get PyKDE working on certain platforms..
I wasn't suggesting it as a PyKDE patch - just include it as part of PyKDE. Particularly as it's necessity suggests a bug in KDE. (Why aren't they using qreal throughout?) > IMHO, given the upswing of arm based mobile devices, maintaining it in > PyQt would yield profit for the whole project (as it would result in > much easier package distribution on those platforms..). Agreed - I'm suggesting reducing the total patch count by one. If the first patch is really needed then I'll include it in PyQt. Phil _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list [email protected] http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
