On 20.04.2010 18:38, ext Mark Summerfield wrote:
Your solution seems reasonable to me. I also like the idea of using the
QVariant.Type names.
OK, nice. I can modify the draft accordingly and send an updated version
for you for review.
Regarding error checking, I assume that :
functionThatTakesAVariant(QVariant.fromInt("123"))
will raise a TypeError (in the QVariant.fromInt() call) or some other
exception? Whereas:
functionThatTakesAVariant("123")
is fine ("123" becomes a QVariant holding a QString behind the scenes)
relying on the automatic conversion. But if you try to cheat you get a
helpful exception.
I checked PyQt's behaviour and that's exactly what happens there so I
assume your assumption is good. :-)
ma.
_______________________________________________
PySide mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
