On Monday 26 April 2010 09:37:01 Matti Airas wrote: > On 23.04.2010 16:18, Airas Matti.P (Nokia-D/Tampere) wrote: > > On 23.04.2010 15:37, ext Mark Summerfield wrote: > >> Thanks, now I can do vim -d and see exactly what you changed (and I'm > >> happy with what you've done). (However, I'd suggest moving from "If the > >> need arises..." to "mapped to None)." to the end of the "No QString and > >> almost no QVariant" section. > > > > OK, did that. It's more logical now. > > > > http://www.pyside.org/docs/pseps/psep-0101.html > > http://www.pyside.org/docs/pseps/psep-0101.txt > > Assuming there're no more pending changes/improvements to this, I'll > mark this Accepted once I get an OK from the core dev team members.
Just some questions about the final version of this PSEP.
- QTextStream::bin, hex, etc wasn't removed?
- I don't really see the need for pyQtConfigure method;
IMO, integrate Qt properties with python is much more important.
For example, instead of write:
obj = QObject()
obj.setObjectName("foo")
print obj.objectName()
we just need to write:
obj = QObject()
obj.objectName = "foo"
print obj.objectName
This is not hard to implement and IMO represents a great gain to this abstract
and subjective thing called by us "pythonic API".
Another point, this time regarding keyword arguments, I guess that we should
follow Qt names, not the PyQt names, ok, I must admit that I'm saying this
just because follow the Qt ones is easier to implement, hehehe, because the
C++ parser knows the Qt argument names, but not the PyQt ones. Anyway I guess
that PyQt is using the Qt argument names.
> Cheers,
>
> ma.
> _______________________________________________
> PySide mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
--
Hugo Parente Lima
INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
