On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Hugo Parente Lima <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm sure that Qt doesn't use properties for one single reason, they doesn't > exists in standard C++, just in some compiler extensions like Borland C++. >
Right, so in view of this, I think it is even more important to provide "choice" (as depicted in the python philosophy, as in "don't enforce, empower"). So for me, which I happen to like the Qt approach to that, I would like to still use the unpythonic setters and getters approach, to maintain more compatibility with my Qt/C++ code once I port it there after I've been prototyping. But for others who are hard core snake worshipers , let's allow them to use them properties :) Sivan _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
