On 12.08.2010 23:37, ext Marcelo Lira wrote:
Now, the point of this email is to change PSEP 101 to allow the QObject (and derived types) constructor to accept setting dynamic Qt properties. PyQt and the current PSEP 101 only provide this for already existing Qt properties, while QObject.setProperty doesn't, and I think this an unnecessarily exceptional behaviour.
As the PSEP editor, my first peeve with this proposal is about changing a PSEP that's already been accepted. Granted, we've done that before, but this time this is a new feature which could as well be presented in a separate PSEP.
I don't have a strong opinion about the proposal itself (both arguments for and against have their merits) but reformulating the mail into a PSEP draft wouldn't have been a biggie and I could've done that myself just to keep the thing going. However, since there obviously is no concensus about the proposal, I doubt whether this would end up being accepted in the end.
Cheers, ma. _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
