On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Luciano Wolf <luciano.w...@openbossa.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Matti Airas <matti.p.ai...@nokia.com> wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> Now that we've been in the beta period for quite some time, we've managed to >> get the Bugzilla backlog in control, and it'd seem that the number of new >> bug reports is slowly decreasing, I think we should be quite close to the >> 1.0 release already, but I'd like to hear more opinions about this one (also >> from the core dev team guys, since we haven't discussed this internally >> recently). >> >> What do you think? Is PySide getting stable enough for the 1.0 label? If >> not, what's still missing? I don't think we can realistically aim for a >> perfect 1.0 release, but it should at least be good enough that any >> developers attracted by the "1.0 promise" shouldn't have their fingers >> burned by a premature release. >> >> When would be the right time to make the release? We'll still have beta5 >> late next week, but two weeks after that, would we be already all set for a >> release candidate? IMO, the release candidate should be really a candidate >> for the final release - we make changes between the rc and final only if >> there are uncaught regressions in the rc. >> > > PySide seems to be quite ready (my very own opinion) and these beta5 + > RC should be enough to have a nice 1.0 release. As you pointed we > can't wait for a perfect (no bugs, no errors, no problems) source code > to be released. > >> How about the release cadence after 1.0? I hope that by doing the release >> candidates, we can avoid any brown paperbag followup releases, and we could >> cool down a bit. The two-week release cadence I've insisted upon has been >> taxing for both the core dev team (especially for the guys doing integration >> to Fremantle, Harmattan, and MeeGo), but also for our valued community >> packagers. I still like the predictability of the time-based release cycle, >> but maybe monthly releases would be sufficient at first? >> > > I'm ok with that monthly release scheme. But I would like to see > something like a nightly build option. Those aiming for the latest > improvements available at git tree wouldn't need to build source code > by themselves. > > > Regards, > Luciano > > >> Cheers, >> >> ma. >> _______________________________________________ >> PySide mailing list >> PySide@lists.openbossa.org >> http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside >> > _______________________________________________ > PySide mailing list > PySide@lists.openbossa.org > http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside >
-- Renato Araujo Oliveira Filho Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia - INdT Mobile: +55 (81) 8704-2144 _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list PySide@lists.openbossa.org http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
