On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Hugo Parente Lima <hugo.l...@openbossa.org> wrote: > On Monday 27 June 2011 13:54:01 Renato Araujo Oliveira Filho wrote: >> Hi PySide developers, >> >> More one round in this fight between gitorious and github. Today we >> have all repositories replicated on github, I have removed all push >> rights from gitorious and have added the respectively user on the >> github projects. >> We the pyside team are very happy with github the server is very >> robust and the tools are useful. >> We have created scripts to keep the main projects (apiextractor, >> generatorrunner, shiboken, pyisde) up to data once a day (during the >> nightly build). But due the gitorious stability problems this script >> does not syc every day, some time this fail with a server hang up, >> then we are keeping this sync manually for now. > > For me this just proves that gitorious services isn't reliable enough for > PySide as we can't guarantee that a project clone would successfully be done > at least 90% of times. > >> We do not intend to keep the other projects up to date on gitorious >> but we would like to listen your opinions about that first. >> >> * What to you think about move the official repository to github? (we >> will keep the gitorious mirror up to date daily) >> * Somebody prefer use gitorious? >> * Do you see any problems on moving pyside related projects, to github? >> >> For now we will keep gitorious as main home for pyside, ultil we have >> this discussion complete, and the necessary work done. > > My opinion is always to reduce the overhead, so my initial vote is to move to > github, not get cloned into it. but if it's not possible and it will require a > manually sync operation I start to get in doubt about the clone despite of the > github services being much better than gitorious >
Reading the comments I've the same feeling as Hugo. During these days that we've been using github the only complain was about a "comment & close / comment" button during the merge request :) So, as we are facing push problems to keep gitorius synced I'm ok in maintaining just github as our repository of choice. If it's not possible lets go back to gitorious only solution. Luciano >> Thanks >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Luciano Wolf >> >> <luciano.w...@openbossa.org> wrote: >> > Hi folks, >> > >> > A few days ago we started using Github as the "main" repository. Any >> > changes are replicated to the gitorious repository (not automated yet, >> > but soon we will have a cron-job taking care of it). >> > >> > We are happy with this move and as soon as we have any news about this >> > auto-sync service we get back to the mailing list. >> > >> > >> > Luciano >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Matti Airas <matti.p.ai...@nokia.com> > wrote: >> >> On 15.06.2011 14:32, ext Henry Gomersall wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 14:18 +0300, Matti Airas wrote: >> >>>> Would it be possible to set a cron-job to one-way sync the Github and >> >>>> Gitorious repos automatically? That way, it shouldn't matter that >> >>>> much >> >>>> for the PySide users. >> >>> >> >>> I was going to suggest that! Isn't the beauty of distributed version >> >>> control that it can be distributed? >> >> >> >> Indeed. :-D >> >> >> >> ma. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> PySide mailing list >> >> PySide@lists.pyside.org >> >> http://lists.pyside.org/listinfo/pyside >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > PySide mailing list >> > PySide@lists.pyside.org >> > http://lists.pyside.org/listinfo/pyside > > -- > Hugo Parente Lima > INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia > _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list PySide@lists.pyside.org http://lists.pyside.org/listinfo/pyside
