On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org> wrote: > Le lundi, 31 octobre 2011 15.20:56, anatoly techtonik a écrit : >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org> wrote: >> > The remaining problems is upstream's bug #1037 which is "shiboken fails >> > to build agains python3.2 debug on i386". >> > >> > #1037: http://bugs.pyside.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1037 >> > >> > So the i386 build will not happen unless this is fixed. >> >> Does that mean that there won't be Oneric package for i386 even if I >> don't need python3.2 support? > > Hmmm. Given that I'm already spending too much time on those PPAs and that > people can use older PySide versions (both from the PPA and from plain > Natty/Oneiric releases) and that python3.2 support should be fixed anyway, I > guess it will be "no", unless a good reason is given to me.
That's ok. I just want to make sure it is not something wrong with my system. Now it is completely clear that the problem is on PySide. Thanks for all your work, guys. PySide is awesome. =) P.S. The reason I worry about 1.0.8 is that Spyder IDE version 2.1.0 is going to be released this Wednesday with an official PySide support. 1.0.8 fixes http://bugs.pyside.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1019 which affects appearance and behavior of search dialogs in the IDE. Although I am comfortable with using PySide from sources (BuildScripts rock!), it will be convenient if other Ubuntu users could use Spyder with PySide as well. -- anatoly t. _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list PySide@lists.pyside.org http://lists.pyside.org/listinfo/pyside
