+1

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Hugo Parente Lima
<hugo.l...@openbossa.org> wrote:
> My proposal is:
>
> - Move APIExtractor to Shiboken project, then APIExtractor would be compiled
> as a static library and linked to Shiboken.
> - Remove GeneratorRunner, i.e. merge it into Shiboken.
>
> Pros:
>
> - No package/repository/etc for ApiExtractor.
> - No need to worry about ApiExtractor ABI, just remember that ApiExtractor
> nowadays isn't "library ready", i.e. it doesn't use d-pointers and all the
> basic stuff that all library code must have to reduce the headache of dealing
> with ABI that can't be broken.
> - No package/repository/etc for GeneratorRunner: nowadays it's just a thin
> layer used to load the generators as plugins, but it's not fully decoupled
> from the generators itself and doesn't have the ability to identify plugin
> versions.
> - Release PySide will be easier: less packages, less binaries, less files to 
> be
> installed on the system.
> - Compile PySide will be easier: No need to compile and install various
> projects in some determined order, you just need two things, Shiboken and
> PySIde.
> - Increase generator speed: this is a minor increase due to the fact that
> there wont be the overhead generated by inter shared objects calls
>
> Cons:
>
> - We will somehow loose a never used flexibility: Today is possible to use
> ApiExtractor in other projects to gather information about C++ files, but his
> was never made by anyone (at least anyone told us), maybe due to the fact that
> ApiExtractor requires a lot of things that only makes sense on "Binding
> Generation World", because it's internals aren't documented enough, etc.
>
> The fact is that this flexibility was never used and I believe it will never
> be, and in any case ApiExtractor will be available as a static library inside
> Shiboken (git submodule?) so if someone want to use it, it'll be there.
>
>
> If nobody is against this proposal, I can do this before the next release
> (some day after 18/feb).
> _______________________________________________
> PySide mailing list
> PySide@lists.pyside.org
> http://lists.pyside.org/listinfo/pyside
>
_______________________________________________
PySide mailing list
PySide@lists.pyside.org
http://lists.pyside.org/listinfo/pyside

Reply via email to