On Wednesday 21 March 2012 06:05:09 anatoly techtonik wrote: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:19 AM, anatoly techtonik <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Matti Airas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 08.03.2012 19:28, ext anatoly techtonik wrote: > >>> Well, somebody needs to execute this stuff - > >>> http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/Importing+Data+from+Bugzil > >>> la > >>> > >>> I'll try to contact tracker list about this. > >> > >> Neat! Thanks. > > > > Done. The letter should appear at > > http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/jeg/ in the March section. > > Good news. JIRA team received the letter and opened an issue (see below). > There are still some questions: > > 1. Should we import all tickets or those that are open right now? > 2. If we import all tickets, should we preserve numbering?
Better to import all tickets preserving the numbering, because many of our unit test are named like test_bugXXX.py, then when we face a regression and need to do some archaeology it's a just a matter of going to bugzilla and see the bug comments. They could ignore bugs with numbers already present on jira, they are really too old anyway, probably from boost::python time. > Please add your concerns to the JIRA ticket. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:53 AM > Subject: RE: [JEG] Import PySide bugs > To: [email protected], [email protected] > > > A JIRA issue has been started to track this request. > https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTJIRA-164 > > Please raise requests to that JIRA project. > -- > anatoly t. > _______________________________________________ > PySide mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside -- Hugo Parente Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
