On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Hugo Parente Lima <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:41:09 anatoly techtonik wrote: >> New repositories have hash numbers reindexed and this breaks all >> versions tagged by BuildScripts. >> Can anybody tell which revisions now correspond to the released 1.1.0 >> so that BuildScript can be updated? > > The hashes were reindexed but the tags still there in the same commits, the > BuildScripts used hashes instead of tag names?
BuildScripts uses git submodules, which refer to revisions, not to tags. But the problem seems even more complex, because it could happen that starting from revisions that was taken out all tagged builds are broken. >> Is it possible to upload old repositories somewhere for archival purposes? >> (searching for hash numbers in Google) > > The old repositories with old hashes are on gitorious: > > http://qt.gitorious.org/pyside/pyside-archive > http://qt.gitorious.org/pyside/shiboken-archive > http://qt.gitorious.org/pyside/apiextractor-archive That's great. Can anybody filter BuildScripts clone to depend on these canonical repositories for previous revisions, and reupload it so that we could have a working bisect there? In the meanwhile I've created a pull request at https://github.com/PySide/BuildScripts/pull/5 to fix BuildScrips so that people can compile current HEAD for testing. -- anatoly t. _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
