Indeed, "QVariant" is not necessary and setting the result type to QObject works, thanks for the info.
2013/1/13 Yosef Meller <yosef...@post.tau.ac.il> > ** > > On Sunday 13 January 2013 14:32:10 Aaron Richiger wrote: > > > I think, this question is related to an earlier one from me... Anatoly > > > then told me the truth about lifetimes of QObjects that are created in > > > methods without any parent reference. They won't survive such a method > > > call as you try to do. By giving your model a parent reference that > > > survives the method call, the model will be available as well after the > > > return statement. The following code also shows, that the "QVariant" > > > trick is not necessary, but setting the result type to QObject is > > > enough. I hope this helps... > > > > You're right, QVariant isn't necessary, only parenting. It's not very > significant though as it only appears in the slot declaration. > > > > BTW, I see in your code that the model's rowCount method is declared as a > slot. What is the value in that? Does anything use this? I'm sure it's > optional because it works without it, but is it generally helpful to > declare it a slot anyway? > > > > Yosef. > > > > _______________________________________________ > PySide mailing list > PySide@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside > >
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list PySide@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
