> Would it be possible to get some rights so that I could change tickets?
I don't know the answer, but it's a good question. My guess is that you would need to become an Approver. According to the Qt Governance Model ( http://qt-project.org/wiki/The_Qt_Governance_Model), an existing Approver must nominate you and another to second that nomination. But I don't know if there are any Approvers left in the project for this to happen. I think Lars Knoll may be the only one who can do this (according to his email). If so, you have my vote of support. On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Sébastien Sablé < sa...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I got a couple bug fixes for shiboken merged into PySide the last few > weeks; I have a few more in the pipe. > > I am too new on the project to be a code reviewer, however I also think > there is a lot of work needed on the issue tracker side: > https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/PYSIDE > There are 111 tickets that not been evaluated at all. > > Would it be possible to get some rights so that I could change tickets? > > I would like to start prioritizing them, possibly closing the one which do > not provide enough information to reproduce or that may be deprecated and > writing unit tests for those which have enough details. > Then I will try to fix one ticket per week depending on how much available > time I have. > > best regards > > Sébastien > > > > > 2013/3/19 lndn <lndn...@gmail.com> > >> Great news, just heard back from Lars Knoll regarding how to add new >> maintainers, see his email reply below. >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:22 AM, Knoll Lars <lars.kn...@digia.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> yes, I'm in the position to add new maintainers. I'd say we follow the >>> process we have on qt-project for this as well. >>> >>> Ideally, Hugo proposes a successor on the pyside mailing list. If he >>> doesn't do it, I would propose to initiate a discussion about the best >>> candidate on the ML. Please put me on CC, so I can follow the thread. If >>> the person gets support on the ML, I'll give him formal maintainer status >>> a little later. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Lars >>> >>> On 3/19/13 12:18 AM, "LNDN" wrote: >>> >>> >Hi Lars, >>> >>> >Are you in a position to add new maintainers to the PySide project? >>> And if so, what >>> >do we need to do on our side to do this? >>> > >>> > >>> >Thank you, >>> >LNDN >>> > >>> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Matti Airas <mai...@iki.fi> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 18 Mar 2013 23:53, "Hugo Parente Lima" <hugo.l...@openbossa.org> >>> wrote: >>> > Yes, I want to step down as maintainer, I'm no longer working on >>> PySide and >>> > the code base in fading out from my memory month after month, the main >>> problem >>> > now is that I don't know who on Qt-Project is responsible for >>> add/remove >>> > approvers/maintainers. >>> >>> I'd like to thank on my behalf for the awesome contribution you've done >>> for PySide over the past years. It's been quite incredible! >>> >>> The different roles and nomination process are described here: >>> >>> http://qt-project.org/wiki/The_Qt_Governance_Model >>> >>> Basically, you, Hugo, should just send an email your proposal to >>> developm...@qt-project.org mailing list. A cc to Lars probably won't >>> harm, but the reasoning should be in public. >>> >>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >>> >>> Nominating a bunch of new approvers at the same time probably wouldn't >>> harm, either... :-) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> ma. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> PySide mailing list >>> PySide@qt-project.org >>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PySide mailing list >> PySide@qt-project.org >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside >> >> >
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list PySide@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
