Can you elaborate on the reasons no one is impressed with the Github tracker?
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:27 PM, John Ehresman <j...@wingware.com> wrote: > At the sprint in Austin, a few of us discussed moving the git repository > where changes are made to github. We would still limit who could push > to a core group of approvers and require someone else to review changes > in almost all cases. The goal is to move away from gerrit / gitorious > to the github tools. Each of us has limited time to contribute to > PySide and we'd rather spend that time improving PySide rather than > learning how to use tools we don't otherwise use. > > What to do with the bug tracker is less clear. It probably would > migrate to github's tracker or another tracker because the current > tracker doesn't work well, but OTOH no one is particularly impressed > with github's tracker. > > We decided to float this idea on email and see what the response was. > Any transition wouldn't happen for a few weeks and all patches should be > submitted via Gerrit until then. > > Cheers, > > John > _______________________________________________ > PySide mailing list > PySide@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside > -- Félix C. Morency, M.Sc. Plateforme d’analyse et de visualisation d’images Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke Centre de recherche clinique Étienne-Le Bel Local Z5-3031 | 819.346.1110 ext 16634
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list PySide@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
