On 12/11/14, 10:49 AM, Todd Rme wrote: > Taking a bit of a step back, what is currently holding Qt 5.x back > from allowing completely dynamic bindings? Has anyone talked to the > Qt devs to see if these pieces could be implemented?
Qt 5.x support is mostly a matter of making changes to compile against Qt5, do the split of the QtGui, go through deprecated and new classes & methods, etc. It's a substantial amount of work but should be relatively straightforward. I don't know what, if anything, could be changed in Qt to make things easier given the need to maintain backward compatibility in Qt. Related but orthogonal is fixing a number of serious bugs that stem from assumptions that shiboken makes about object lifetime. This is what motivates the desire to either fix shiboken or move to another binding tool. I think what PySide needs is a small group of developers to work on it. There is a developer mailing list at pyside-...@googlegroups.com and I think we should discuss how development should move forward. Note that to contribute to the PySide core, a knowledge of C++ and the Python C api or the willingness to learn them is required. John _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list PySide@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
