On 2015-02-09 11:06 AM, Stephan Deibel wrote: > I think that current users are on Qt4 and don't have immediate plans > to move to Qt5 so that work isn't being done. It'll happen when > someone gets to that point. > > The same is true about replacing Shiboken or otherwise partly > rewriting PySide, which in the long term probably is needed to make it > more maintainable. It works well enough for people, so the motivation > hasn't been high enough for someone to take that on. > > Most of the more serious and heavily invested current users of PySide > are there because of licensing issues in PyQt and thus can't just move > over to PyQt. The key issue is that if someone sells a product with a > scripting API then PyQt requires paying a per-user licensing fee. Not > a large one, but it's still a problem for some, for example if you're > giving away a lot of free licenses on the side, or just want to avoid > this sort of entanglement. I doubt that is going away, but if it does > than so may PySide. > > - Stephan > Thanks for the response Stephan! And thanks Roman for removing the note from the wiki page!
I'm glad to see that PySide is still alive and kicking. Cheers, Robert _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list PySide@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/pyside
