Hi Ivan,
thanks much for the detailed response.
I thought the reason why the new where() requires a string is that you
already have a parser.
Shows you what I know...
Like I said, it's only minor and I can certainly get used to the proposed
syntax.
Please keep up the good work. You save me from having to use ROOT.
In my (not very detailed) tests I found that the performance out of the box
of pytables1 is already better than for ROOT files, at least memory-wise.
Maybe I will make a more detailed comparison when 2.0 final is out, but it
appears to me that the caching algorithm is done more intelligently and it
is certainly easier to tweak it even more by simply modifying a single file.
Plus of course being able to use Python.
So in summary I am _very_ happy that I found pytables.
You guys help me enjoy my data again ! :-)
Cheers,
Jan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Pytables-users mailing list
Pytables-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pytables-users
