[Gabriel, you kept sending this to pytables-announce, instead of pytables-user ;)]
El dt 06 de 03 del 2007 a les 08:37 -0800, en/na [EMAIL PROTECTED] va escriure: > Hi, I might be missing something, but if I wanted the value in row i, > col 'colname', I often used table[i]['colname'] in pytables version 1. > This also works in version 2 if the file has been created with that > version, but not if files have been created with version 1. In the > former case table[i] returns an object of type 'numpy.void', in the > latter an object of type 'instance'. Is there a way to get this to > work for version 1 files too? This has been fixed in trunk. Now, a NestedRecArray container is always returned so as to mimic the behaviour of PyTables 1.x. So, you will be able use table[i]['colname'] again. However, this makes me wonder whether objects labeled with a 'numarray' flavor in files created with PyTables 1.x shouldn't be delivered as 'numpy' objects in PyTables 2.x. I think this should be a good thing in general (after all, in PyTables 2.x 'numpy' is the default flavor, as 'numarray' was for 1.x). Nevertheless, there would surely be a few people that would want to honor the old 'numarray' flavor for PyTables 1.x files even when using PyTables 2.x. Opinions? Cheers, -- Francesc Altet | Be careful about using the following code -- Carabos Coop. V. | I've only proven that it works, www.carabos.com | I haven't tested it. -- Donald Knuth ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Pytables-users mailing list Pytables-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pytables-users
