OK, that shouldn't be a problem. Thanks for the help! Anand
On May 21, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote: > Anand Patil (el 2008-05-20 a les 22:54:10 +0100) va dir:: > >> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> wrote: >> >>> Then, if you have more than 4096 >>> nodes, you should be careful not to place them all in the same >>> group to >>> avoid performance problems with the object tree. >> >> Do you mean 4096 leaf nodes, or 4096 nodes in general? Is it OK to >> have more >> than 4096 groups, with only a few EArrays etc. each, in the same >> group? > > Well, the problem raises when you cram a lot of child nodes (be them > groups or leaves) right under a single group. It's completely OK to > have way more than 4096 nodes in a file (the LRU node cache handles > this > efficiently and PyTables only loads the nodes you actually use). > Grouping childs into fewer groups is OK, as long as there are less > than > 4096 groups, and the groups themselves have less than 4096 children > each. > > HTH, > > :: > > Ivan Vilata i Balaguer @ Welcome to the European Banana Republic! @ > http://www.selidor.net/ @ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ @ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/_______________________________________________ > Pytables-users mailing list > Pytables-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pytables-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Pytables-users mailing list Pytables-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pytables-users
