Hi Peter, A Thursday 25 June 2009 01:08:34 Peter Alexander escrigué: > Hi Francesc, > > Would it be possible for you to consider using a more conventional > package naming schema for beta/alpha/rc packages. It makes it a little > more difficult for the downstream packagers. Conventionally, I > believe, a beta package is listed as less then the milestone package > number. So for instance instead of tables-2.2b1, something in like > tables-2.1.9xxx could be used and not mess up the chronological order > for package maintainers. > > At least that's my preference and probably works for all package systems.
I see your point. However, as I see this issue, beta releases are just meant for beta testers, not for making into a distribution package. In fact, I'm following the same convention than Python itself, and I think it works pretty well for most uses. > As always Francesc thanks for pytables. You are welcome! -- Francesc Alted ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Pytables-users mailing list Pytables-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pytables-users
