A Wednesday 09 June 2010 21:35:44 German Ocampo escrigué: > Francesc > > Many thanks for your quick answer, I made a test without Psyco and it > works, but the problem that I have, psyco is a vital part of my > project. > > I run the same test, but iterating over all the rows and I making > inside the loop an explicit condition and it works with psyco
So, if you need psyco, then why not use the explicit condition venue? > Are there some alternative way to iterate over some rows in a table > that satisface a condition and the posibility of modify the table > values? The one that you show us is the most powerful for single loops that I can think of. Another option would be to retrieve large chunks of rows out of your table (for example, using Table.read()); you will get a NumPy structured array. Then update the necessary fields in the structured array. Finally update the table on disk from these modified NumPy arrays (using Table.modifyRows(), for example). I don't know if the above procedure would work with psyco and if it would be faster than what are you doing now, but it is worth a try. -- Francesc Alted ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Pytables-users mailing list Pytables-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pytables-users
