2010/8/15, Vineet Jain <vinjv...@gmail.com>: > While looking at the code I noticed the function: > > tables.tableExtension.getNestedFieldCache > > does a try except block on every row lookup like row[0], row[1]. Is > that not going to be rather slow?
In general, a ``try: except` ` block is faster than a `hasattr` or `has_key` when the key exists. As I wanted to favor positive cases (we are dealing with a cache after all), I've chosen the former. Cheers, -- Francesc Alted ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Pytables-users mailing list Pytables-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pytables-users
