Hi All,

Thanks for setting up all this. I'll be traveling till Tuesday to
check out one of the options for my new job. If you decide to meet
before I am back, I'll take a look at the meeting notes and let you
know what I think. I guess the best is to keep the momentum going ;)

Take care and talk to you soon,
batu.

On Sunday, June 5, 2011, Josh Moore <josh.mo...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Anthony et al.
>
> On Jun 5, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
>
>> Congrats & Thanks Francesc on the new more liberal licence!
>>
>> And Josh, 'scopatz' is indeed me.
>
> Cool. Done.
>
>> Could you also add Batuhan and Henry, as they indicated an interest in
>> helping out.
>
> Batuhan has been added since he added himself as a watcher of the repository. 
> I don't have a user name for Henry, though.
>
>> I have also started a PyTables group on convore, if we need to discuss
>> things there. https://convore.com/pytables/
>
> Interesting. I've never used convore before, but it may make sense to move 
> all of our discussions there in the short-term to not overwhelm the users 
> list. Any thoughts? Would people rather keep the discussion here? (We've 
> gained half a dozen watchers who are not involved in this conversation. They 
> may have found out about the move via the list, in which case keeping things 
> visible may be a sensible goal).
>
>> We should probably have a discussion on what needs to be done in the
>> near term and where we think things are going.
>
> Agreed. I've added everything that I had scribbled on a sheet of paper since 
> Friday as github issues. Feel free to add your own, comment on others, etc. 
> "#6 Schedule first governance meeting" could definitely stand to be commented 
> on by everyone, both to when & how (IRC, skype, webex, ...). It might even 
> make sense to set up something on doodle.com.
>
>> Be Well
>> Anthony
>
> Cheers,
> ~Josh
>
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Josh Moore <josh.mo...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> On Jun 3, 2011, at 11:37 PM, Francesc Alted wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Josh,
>>>>
>>>> 2011/6/3 Josh Moore <josh.mo...@gmx.de>
>>>>
>>>>> First of all, an amazing thanks to Francesc for making PyTables Pro
>>>>> available!! This is a great opportunity to help boost the interest in
>>>>> PyTables and keep it growing now that it's being kicked out of the
>>>>> proverbial nest. :)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I had mentioned to him that the newly-created governance system put in
>>>>> place by the Jenkins (formerly Hudson) developers might be a good model,
>>> and
>>>>> was hoping that something similar would be amenable to this group. I
>>>>> definitely second Steven Bamford's idea of making the code available on
>>>>> github, but it shouldn't be necessary for it to belong to one person.
>>>>>
>>>>> Instead, I created a PyTables organization:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/PyTables
>>>>>
>>>>> and pushed the trunk branch created via:
>>>>>
>>>>> git svn clone --authors authors.txt -s
>>>>> http://www.pytables.org/svn/pytables/PyTablesPro/
>>>>>
>>>>> to:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/PyTables/PyTables
>>>>>
>>>>> Everyone who's expressed interest in maintenance duties should be added
>>> to
>>>>> the organization, and I'll turn over ownership to Francesc until we've
>>>>> decided how things move forward.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I like your solution very much.  Thanks for moving forward so fast :)
>>> I'm
>>>> fine to have ownership for the time being, but I prefer if other person
>>> can
>>>> take it over. Or, cannot we have several owners at the same time?
>>>
>>> Definitely. There can be any number of owners, and you need not be one of
>>> them! :)
>>>
>>> I tried to find the people who had mentioned wanting to take an active role
>>> on
>>> github and found these:
>>>
>>> • avalentino (Antonio Valentino)
>>> • bamford
>>> • scopatz (Anthony Scopatz)
>>> • wesm (Wes McKinney)
>>>
>>> Can you confirm that you are who I thought you were, not that some poor
>>> githubber
>>> is wondering what this "pytables" thing is. And if there are any other
>>> github
>>> users, please speak up.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> If the organization isn't the right way to go, we can delete it
>>> completely.
>>>>> No harm done. If we want to keep it around, a first topic of discussion
>>>>> might be what to do with the PyTables (non-Pro) svn. Does it get added
>>> to a
>>>>> separate repository for historical/practical reasons?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, I plan to maintain pytables.org for at least a year, so I think we
>>> can
>>>> go directly with Pro in github, and in case anybody wants the 'old'
>>> PyTables
>>>> std, it can always create a new branch anywhere.
>>>
>>> Understood and agreed.
>>>
>>>>> "PyTablesStd"? A second topic might be whether or not maintenance is
>>>>> wanted/needed for python-blosc and carray:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/FrancescAlted/python-blosc
>>>>> https://github.com/FrancescAlted/carray
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I *do* have the purpose to continue with Blosc and carray as my toy
>>>> projects, so I think I can still be the maintainer for those if you

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger.
Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe,
secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's about.
Get your free trial download today. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2 
_______________________________________________
Pytables-users mailing list
Pytables-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pytables-users

Reply via email to