I completely forgot about the CSI index. That's of course much easier than
what I suggested ;-)
Am 22.03.2012 17:39 schrieb "Francesc Alted" <fal...@gmail.com>:
> On 3/22/12 11:02 AM, sreeaurovindh viswanathan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If I have three columns in a table and if i wish to sort based on one
> > field and then on the other what would be the recommended method.I
> > would be sorting atleast 75,00,000 records at a time.
> >
> > ie I would like to use something equivalent the following sql query.
> >
> > Select * from sample.table order by query desc,keyword asc.
> Provided that you have created a CSI index on this field, there are a
> couple of ways for doing this:
>
> 1) Table.itersorted(): retrieves the table records in sorted order
>
> 2) Table.readSorted(): retrieves the complete sorted table as a
> monolithic structured array
>
> Both methods follow ascending order by default. Choose a step=-1 for
> choosing a descending order.
>
> -- Francesc Alted
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF email is sponsosred by:
> Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
> _______________________________________________
> Pytables-users mailing list
> Pytables-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pytables-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Pytables-users mailing list
Pytables-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pytables-users
