On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 16:20 +0200, Anatoly Bubenkov wrote: > we try to keep tests isolated, so for us it's not useful, but i agree it's > a valid use-case
You might still have faster running tests with grouping because, say, you have 3 (independent) session scoped fixtures are used throughout your tests and with "-n4" they will be created four times while with "node-binding" it might only happen 3 times. best, holger P.S: IMHO it'd a pity that Gmail seduces people to always do top level posts. > On 23 October 2014 15:48, holger krekel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Currently, pytest-xdist in load-balancing ("-n4") does not support > > grouping of tests or influencing how tests are distributed to nodes. > > Bruno Oliveira did a PR that satisfies his company's particular > > requirements, > > in that GUI tests must run after all others and pinned to a particular > > note. > > (https://bitbucket.org/hpk42/pytest-xdist/pull-request/11/) > > > > My question is what needs do you have wrt to test distribution with xdist? > > I'd like to collect and write down some user stories before we design > > options/mechanisms and then possibly get to implement them. Your input > > is much appreciated. > > > > best and thanks, > > holger > > _______________________________________________ > > pytest-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev > > > > > > -- > Anatoly Bubenkov _______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
