Hi Ronny, could you first outline the problem you are trying to solve?
holger On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 00:48 +0100, Ronny Pfannschmidt wrote: > > Hi, > > since i did hit the generator test i started to create a proof of > concept on solving it by creating the pytest_pyfunc_interpret_result > hook. > > now instead of running at collect time, generators checks run inline > > this currently degrades reporting > * breaks on first fail > * no separate reports per check > > and it degrades nose support * no generator check setup/teardown > > while i suppose its possible to extend generator support with > teardown in a hackish fashin i think going for a clean solution > makes more sense > > is anyone propperly using these features? > > > onwards i'd like to check how to extend > pytest_pyfunc_interpret_result with convenience for asyncio and > twisted > > > -- Ronny > _______________________________________________ > pytest-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev > _______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
