On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 22:53 +0200, Anatoly Bubenkov wrote: > Its not always enough and possible to use inline run, but indeed helps for > pytest-cov
I'd like to make inline_run behave as much as possible like runpytest() (which creates a subprocess). One issue is capturing output, what are others in your experience? holger > On Apr 17, 2015 11:34 PM, "Eduardo Schettino" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks, I solved my problem using testdir.inline_run(). > > > > The lack of output doesnt matter because I can use TestReport objects... > > > > cheers > > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Anatoly Bubenkov <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Yes i had the same issue and solved it by avoiding pytest-cov. > >> See pytest-splinter and its tox.ini coveralls testenv. > >> On Apr 17, 2015 8:39 PM, "Eduardo Schettino" <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I am using the pytester plugin to test my own plugin. > >>> > >>> It works ok but I can not get code coverage because testdir.runpytest > >>> uses os.popen(). > >>> Have anyone managed to work around that? Can you point me to a > >>> project/plugin that handles that? > >>> > >>> cheers, > >>> Eduardo > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> pytest-dev mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev > >>> > >>> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pytest-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pytest-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev -- about me: http://holgerkrekel.net/about-me/ contracting: http://merlinux.eu _______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
