* Bruno Oliveira <[email protected]> [2016-01-23 13:20:42 +0000]: > Hi Ronny, > > Sounds good too me. We've put off 2.9 for some time now. > > Let's start planning 2.9 two weeks for now then, to see if any critical bug > which warrants a 2.8.7 release shows up.
Make that 2.8.8 I guess? :P But +1 on a 2.9 release. > As an aside, I would like to see #1199 [1] in 2.9 as it will open up the > path to solve a number of bugs dependent on py.code. > > [1] https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/1199 I lost track a bit - what's holding this back? Ronny proposed adding deprecation warnings to replace ExceptionInfo objects. It seems to me like this is unrelated to the rest of the py.code move, no? Maybe it should be tackled separately, say for 2.10? Florian -- http://www.the-compiler.org | [email protected] (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
