On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Thomas De Schampheleire < patrickdeping...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Oliver, > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:17 AM, oliver <oliver.schoenb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thomas, is your idea that given test code like this: > > > > from unittest.case import TestCase > > class YourTestCase(TestCase): > > def setUp(self): > > do stuff > > def test1(self): > > a, b = 2, 1 > > self.assertGreater(a, b) > > > > > > you would prefer to convert to what, something like this: > > > > from unittest.case import TestCase > > class YourTestCase(TestCase): > > def setup_method(self): > > do stuff > > def test1(self): > > a, b = 2, 1 > > assert a > b > > > > > > Am i understanding correctly? > > Yes, indeed. Although that I think that to allow the setup_method > calls you can no longer inherit from unittest. In my case, we had: > > class YourTestCase(TestController) > > where TestController is unittest-based which I am replacing to > > class YourTestCase(TestControllerPytest) > > But that last type of conversion is probably impossible for a general > script like nose2pytest, so I can imagine I'll do that conversion > manually. > DId you mean TestCase? Can you provide more detail, this looks like a straight rename. Removing the base class is definitely possible, and I believe the two unittest2pytest do this, have you tried them? > > Do you think the assert conversion is possible? > For sure, but as Florian pointed out, this already seems possible via unittest2pytest, is there something that nose2pytest does for nose tests that neither of the 2 unittest2pytest do for unittest tests? Oliver
_______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list pytest-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
