* Bruno Oliveira <[email protected]> [2016-08-23 16:12:03 +0000]: > Since 3.0.0 was released, two regressions have been reported and this > afternoon the fix for the last one was merged. > > Unless someone still has some issue that they would like to work on for > this release, I was thinking of making a 3.0.1 release tonight. What you > guys think? Should we wait a few more days to see if other regressions show > up, or the two we found so far are enough to warrant a release?
Maybe we should try and get in a fix for the empty parametrization regression too? https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/1849 I can take a look, but that definitely won't be tonight, and probably won't be until the weekend. Other than that, +1 for a 3.0.1 sooner than later - I think the parametrization thing is potentially dangerous (we're just calling functions with arguments nobody wanted them to be called with...) and affecting a handful of people. Florian -- http://www.the-compiler.org | [email protected] (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
