Hi everyone, On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 7:03 PM Ronny Pfannschmidt < [email protected]> wrote:
> with the recent discovery of > https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/2398 which was a result of > accidentally introducing object as base class in pytest-2.9.1 via > https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/pull/1486 > > since https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/pull/2179 , which will go > into pytest-3.1 does the "same" > i propose considering this as breaking change (since there are subtle > differences on the python 2 side after all) > > while doing that we can also gracefully resolve the regression by > documenting the earlier accidental change and the new expectations. > Any thoughts on this proposal? I would like to release the new version this week if possible, so it would be nice to get this discussion going. :) Cheers, Bruno.
_______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
