On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:59:32AM +0000, Bruno Oliveira wrote: > > (btw - I feel like everyone's life would be easier if we'd just push > > release canditates to PyPI which are installable with --pre. Then we can > > also simply do an rc2 in cases like this) > > > > Hmmm that does sound like a good idea at first. Two things came to my mind > though: > > 1. Doesn't tox install dependencies with --pre? If that's true then tox > users would install the release candidate by default.
Not by default, only when you tell it to: http://tox.readthedocs.io/en/latest/config.html#confval-pip_pre=True%7CFalse(default) > 2. Our release process doesn't account for it today, so we would have to > review it (specially changelog wise I think). What would change about changelogs? You could still just finalize the changelog with the final release, I think. Florian -- https://www.qutebrowser.org | m...@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | https://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | https://email.is-not-s.ms/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list pytest-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
