Sounds good, thanks. On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 5:52 PM Ronny Pfannschmidt < [email protected]> wrote:
> i propose that unless someone vetos, i'll take a look into activating it > for pytest-dev/pytest on monday. > > -- Ronny > > Am Freitag, den 08.12.2017, 18:12 +0000 schrieb Bruno Oliveira: > > Howdy Ronny, > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:36 PM Ronny Pfannschmidt < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > a while back the people behind gitmate.io did interview me to expand > their perspective with focus on how pytest does things as well as how i > do certain things at work, > > they also provided me with a basic example on what i would have done > for pytest: > > https://gitmate.io/report/https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpytest-dev%2Fpytest > > i beleive it would help to free up a lof of volunteer time from issue > triaging to start and use such a tool. > > > Looking at the features page[1] it indeed does seem helpful. > > I'm definitely +1 to use GitMate if it will help us cut down on issue > triaging. We can always disable it later if it is not working out for us. > > [1] https://gitmate.io/features > > Cheers, > Bruno > > > > -- Ronny > _______________________________________________ > pytest-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev > >
_______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
