Thank you guys for answering my question. Everything is clear now. I was thinking that maybe this was missing from the documentation. But it makes no sens add it since it not a real feature. Let's just hope that people don't using it too extensively.
Thank you, keep up the good work. Edgar 2018-01-08 21:32 GMT+01:00 Floris Bruynooghe <f...@devork.be>: > Curious. I'm rather reluctant to tell people to use or rely on this > however. Which I guess is the actual question that was asked. ;-) To > me this seems like an implementation detail of the mark.parametrize > decorator. > > Besides, is it really a good idea to make your parametrisation so > indirect? I think you're breaking the abstraction fixtures are trying > to create for you: You request the fixture and you should not be caring > about how to create it, about whether is uses other fixtures to create > itself and whether or not it is parametrised. I know there are > exceptions to all rules, but it's a good design consideration to think > about before constructing many intricately and tightly coupled > dependencies. > > > Regards, > Floris > > > "Geiger, Davin" <davin.gei...@intel.com> writes: > > > A disadvantage could be that the fixture code (of the depended fixture) > will not be executed. > > > > This means no preparation and cleanup steps are executed. > > > > From: pytest-dev [mailto:pytest-dev-bounces+davin.geiger= > intel....@python.org] On Behalf Of Ronny Pfannschmidt > > Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 14:36 > > To: Bruno Oliveira <nicodde...@gmail.com> > > Cc: Edgar Ostrowski <edgar.ostrow...@gmail.com>; pytest-dev < > pytest-dev@python.org> > > Subject: Re: [pytest-dev] Parametrizing dependent fixtures > > > > Hi, > > > > my understanding is, that the direct parametrization replaces the > fixture lookup for the involved tests, > > which is not a planned "feature" per se, but still a neat tool to have > > > > -- Ronny > > > > 2018-01-08 14:07 GMT+01:00 Bruno Oliveira <nicodde...@gmail.com<mailto:n > icodde...@gmail.com>>: > > Hi Edgar, > > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:32 AM Edgar Ostrowski < > edgar.ostrow...@gmail.com<mailto:edgar.ostrow...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Anyway I would like to confirm that this is valid way of using the > parametrize marker. > > > > I did not look at the video yet, but fixture parametrization only works > by using @pytest.fixture(params=...). Markers don't do anything when > applying to fixtures. > > > > Hope that clarifies things! > > > > Cheers, > > Bruno. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pytest-dev mailing list > > pytest-dev@python.org<mailto:pytest-dev@python.org> > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn, > > > > Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, > > > > Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael > O'Neill, Eric Shander > > Intel Deutschland GmbH > > Registered Address: Am Campeon 10-12, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany > > Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de > > Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Christian Lamprechter > > Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau > > Registered Office: Munich > > Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928 > > _______________________________________________ > > pytest-dev mailing list > > pytest-dev@python.org > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev >
_______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list pytest-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
