On 12/28/06, Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/27/06, neal.norwitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Remove PyFloat_AsReprString() and PyFloat_AsString() which should not
> > have been public due to passing buffers without lengths.
>
> Should we do this for 2.6 as well? That is, leave them in under the old name
> for binary compatibility, but #define them to a nonexisting function so new
> source-compiles fail?

That's fine with me if you want to go ahead and do it.

n
_______________________________________________
Python-3000-checkins mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000-checkins

Reply via email to